<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DrugR &#187; censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drugr.org/tag/censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drugr.org</link>
	<description>Fighting a war on the war on drugs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:48:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Australian firewall</title>
		<link>http://drugr.org/2009/12/21/the-australian-firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://drugr.org/2009/12/21/the-australian-firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Least Squared Difference</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drugr.org/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently there is a big hoohah about the Australian web firewall. Why is this of interest to us, as proponents of drug reform? Well, in the linked article it says: “Content defined under the National Classification Scheme as Refused Classification includes child sexual abuse imagery, bestiality, sexual violence, detailed instruction in crime, violence or drug [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently there is <a href="http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2009/12/australias-great-barrier/">a big hoohah about the Australian web firewall</a>. Why is this of interest to us, as proponents of drug reform? Well, in the linked article it says:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“Content defined under the National Classification Scheme as Refused Classification includes child sexual abuse imagery, bestiality, sexual violence, detailed instruction in crime, violence or drug use and/or material that advocates the doing of a terrorist act.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Notice the reference to content that&#8217;s related to drug use. Do you think Erowid will be filtered? Given that there is a plethora of drug information which includes chemical synthesis, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised. Especially since Australia has in the past been one of the few countries that <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/6193496.html">refused classification of Fallout 3 due to it depicting drug use</a>. This seems strange because plenty of games have power-ups (mushrooms from Mario Brothers anyone?), perhaps the mistake Fallout 3 made was to depict this as actually have a realistic method of implementing these power ups? And surely the impacts of negative consequence and addiction in the game probably scared the censors too, since it&#8217;d be terrible thing for people to be forewarned of the potential dangers of drug use right?</p>
<p>Now the Australian government can prevent the public from doing their own research about drugs, and they won&#8217;t have to be pestered by the public finding out the relative safety of illegal substances versus alcohol in society. Instead, they can feed people whatever misinformation they like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drugr.org/2009/12/21/the-australian-firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
